<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tabphobia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diaryofawebsite.com/blog/2007/04/tabphobia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diaryofawebsite.com/blog/2007/04/tabphobia/</link>
	<description>Diary of a website : design by caffeine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:58:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-beta2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: karmatosed</title>
		<link>http://www.diaryofawebsite.com/blog/2007/04/tabphobia/comment-page-1/#comment-14727</link>
		<dc:creator>karmatosed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diaryofawebsite.com/blog/2007/04/tabphobia/#comment-14727</guid>
		<description>@J Bradford: Jinx! I agree like with all fads (it&#039;s in their nature) it will pass. I think I&#039;ve reached the annoying &#039;tipping point&#039;.

@Andrew: Of course, anything can be done well and it will get noticed, it&#039;s more the sorting good from noise of clones. That gets harder the more and more you see - it&#039;s like some design desensitization.

@Mike: I agree the technique came at that point, it&#039;s more the widespread use and adopting of a particular style in regards to the tabbing. I guess the web 2.0 thing I really mean is that particular style I think we all know only too well and have had requested too many times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@J Bradford: Jinx! I agree like with all fads (it&#8217;s in their nature) it will pass. I think I&#8217;ve reached the annoying &#8216;tipping point&#8217;.</p>
<p>@Andrew: Of course, anything can be done well and it will get noticed, it&#8217;s more the sorting good from noise of clones. That gets harder the more and more you see &#8211; it&#8217;s like some design desensitization.</p>
<p>@Mike: I agree the technique came at that point, it&#8217;s more the widespread use and adopting of a particular style in regards to the tabbing. I guess the web 2.0 thing I really mean is that particular style I think we all know only too well and have had requested too many times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Papageorge</title>
		<link>http://www.diaryofawebsite.com/blog/2007/04/tabphobia/comment-page-1/#comment-14718</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Papageorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diaryofawebsite.com/blog/2007/04/tabphobia/#comment-14718</guid>
		<description>I think the rounded tab thing really took off back when Douglas Bowman wrote the sliding doors articles on alistapart. From that point on everyone could have a set of rounded tabs by simply lifting his images from that article. My point being I&#039;m not sure that this is a web 2.0 thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the rounded tab thing really took off back when Douglas Bowman wrote the sliding doors articles on alistapart. From that point on everyone could have a set of rounded tabs by simply lifting his images from that article. My point being I&#8217;m not sure that this is a web 2.0 thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://www.diaryofawebsite.com/blog/2007/04/tabphobia/comment-page-1/#comment-14670</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Faulkner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diaryofawebsite.com/blog/2007/04/tabphobia/#comment-14670</guid>
		<description>I hear you on the &#039;Web2.0&#039; thing. Tabs have been murdered over the last year or so. On the bright side though, there is still plenty of opportunity to create original tabs (patterned/textured) if all the rest are round and shiny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you on the &#8216;Web2.0&#8242; thing. Tabs have been murdered over the last year or so. On the bright side though, there is still plenty of opportunity to create original tabs (patterned/textured) if all the rest are round and shiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Bradford</title>
		<link>http://www.diaryofawebsite.com/blog/2007/04/tabphobia/comment-page-1/#comment-14618</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Bradford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diaryofawebsite.com/blog/2007/04/tabphobia/#comment-14618</guid>
		<description>I was writing an article on this subject myself, and I think we&#039;re only about a year away from this fad returning to a practically used choice rather than a must-have fad. I just get frustrated that even if I WANTED to use tabs, I would be seen (by some) as an unoriginal hack, because they&#039;re so &quot;in&quot; right now. I don&#039;t think they should go away, I think of them like tables. Use them when they are appropriate, not because they are easy. If content is king, appropriateness is prince (or queen... or princess... whichever you like)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was writing an article on this subject myself, and I think we&#8217;re only about a year away from this fad returning to a practically used choice rather than a must-have fad. I just get frustrated that even if I WANTED to use tabs, I would be seen (by some) as an unoriginal hack, because they&#8217;re so &#8220;in&#8221; right now. I don&#8217;t think they should go away, I think of them like tables. Use them when they are appropriate, not because they are easy. If content is king, appropriateness is prince (or queen&#8230; or princess&#8230; whichever you like)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
